classical argument outline

1. The introduction, which warms up the audience, establishes goodwill and rapport with the readers, and announces the general theme or thesis of the argument.

I will start by describing the situation everyone is already familiar with:
computers are more cleaver than brains.  Then I will shift attention to computers are not cleaver than brains. I will  explain my argument brains are more cleaver than computers.

2. The narration, which summarizes relevant background material, provides any information the audience needs to know about the environment and circumstances that produce the argument, and set up the stakes-what’s at risk in this question. In academic writing, this often takes the form of a literature review.

I will summarize the research I've done and provide an explanation for why brains are more cleaver
than computers. The human brain can calculate their partner's DNA, separate different catagories and recognized same things, nonthless in different places or in different illumination.

3. The confirmation,which lays out in a logical order (usually strongest to weakest or most obvious to most subtle) the claims that support the thesis, providing evidence for each claim.

 The human brain can calculate their partner's DNA, separate different catagories and recognized same things, nonthless in different places or in different illumination. However, current computers are cannot do these the human brain's ability.

4. The refutation and concession, which looks at opposing viewpoints to the writer’s claims, anticipating objections from the audience, and allowing as much of the opposing viewpoints as possible without weakening the thesis.

Many people think that current computers are much, much cleaver than the human brain. Because, current computers can caculate more faster than the human brain and current computers can memorize more correctly and computers are memorize more than the humans brain. However, human brain is much and much bigger than any current computers. then, the human brain have body that can use computer or smart phone's memory.

5. The summation, which provides a strong conclusion, amplifying the force of the argument,  and showing the readers that this solution is the best at meeting the circumstances.

In my conclusion, the human brain is much, much cleaver than any current computers. Current computers are calculate more faster and memorize more correctly and more memorize than the human brain.

first draft

                                The   Classical   Argument

Nowadays many people think that computers are more cleaver than brains. However, the fact is the human brain is more cleaver than computers. Therefore, I want find the fact of the human brain has more faculties than any other computers. My arguments are explain why brains are more cleaver than computers.

1. Brains are analogue; computers are digital.
2.  The brain uses content-addressable memory.
3.  The brain is a massively parallel machine; computers are modular and serial.
4.  Processing speed is not fixed in the brain; there is no system clock.
5.  Short-term memory is not like RAM.
6.  No hardware/software distinction can be made with respect to the brain or mind.
7.  Synapses are far more complex than electrical logic gates.
8.  Unlike computers, processing and memory are performed by the same components in the brain.
9.  The brain is a self-organizing system.
10.  Brains have bodies.
11.  The brain is much, much bigger than any current computers.

The Introduction

The human brain can control human's body and brains are much bigger than any current computers. In addition, the human brain has body and it can calculation, memorize more abstructly than any current computers. That's mean the human brain is more useful and it has more fantastic abilities than any current computer. That arugument support that the human brain is more cleaver than any current computers.

The Narration

In the narration, I'm going to explain about why the human brain is more cleaver than any current computers. then, I'm going to summerize in the introduction. The human brain can calculate their partner's DNA, separate different catagories and recognized same things, nonthless in different places or in different illumination. Therefore, the human brain is more cleaver than any current computers.

The Confirmation

I believe the human brain is more cleaver than any current computers. I'm going to explain about why I am think so. Because, the human brain can calculate their partner's DNA, separate different catagories and recognized same things, nonthless in different places or in different illumination. However, current computers are cannot do these the human brain's ability. That mean why not brains are more cleaver than any current computers.

The Refutation and Concession

Many people think that current computers are much, much cleaver than the human brain. Because, current computers can caculate more faster than the human brain and current computers can memorize more correctly and computers are memorize more than the humans brain. However, human brain is much and much bigger than any current computers. then, the human brain have body that can use computer or smart phone's memory. that mean, the human brain is more cleaver than any current computers.

The Conclusion

In my conclusion, the human brain is much, much cleaver than any current computers. Current computers are calculate more faster and memorize more correctly and  more memorize than the human brain. however, the human brain can calculate their's partner's DNA, separate  different catagories and recognized same things, nonthless in different places or in different illumination. Moreover, the human brain is much, much bigger than any current computers and the human brain have boby that can use computer or smart phone's memory.

 

 

articulation

1) My argument Write your argument in one sentence. Then, spend some time explaining it.
I want to argue that brains are more cleaver than computers. Our brains can thinking and our brains have many emotions. however, computers can only response to commends of human. Its cannot thinking, speaking, and moving.

 2) How I found my argument Explain how your research helped you find your argument. Or, in other words, how did your research evolve into your argument? Start with your research question.
My first research question was, 10 differences between brains and computers. I research difference between brains and computers. "Brains are cleaver than computers." It is my argument. I research brains are analogue, computers are digital. That is evolve into my argument.



3) New research questions What do you still need to know? What is your research plan?
a) difference between brains and computers.
b) I will research about features of brain and computer.


4) Connections to the Harvard Sampler How is your argument connected to the Harvard Sampler? ANY CONNECTION IS VALID. Please focus on choosing a good argument first, then think about how it is related to the Harvard Sampler. I will help you think of the connection if necessary.
Harvard Sampler related to how difference between brains and computers. Harvard Sampler suggest that surprising and amazing of human brains. Brains are more useful than computers.